Let’s Liberate Diversity! News
Series of surveys on forgotten crops – Radiant EU
Within the RADIANT EU project, the organisers of this survey exercise aim to support European policies and strategies that release the full value of neglected or forgotten crops and plant species within the food value chain. While in fact the current socio-economic...
European Citizens’ Initiative Forum for the Right to Food: what’s boiling in the pot?
In April 2023, the inaugural Democratic Forum in Geneva brought together global leaders, activists, and organizations to tackle the critical issues surrounding the right to food and food sovereignty. This landmark event culminated in the creation of the Geneva Right to Food Manifesto, garnering significant support from influential bodies such as the FAO, IFAD, and WHO, as well as endorsements from the UN Special Rapporteurs on the Right to Food and the Chairperson of the Committee for World Food Security. Let’s Liberate Diversity! was invited to present on the current state of agrobiodiversity, the active social movements on seeds, and the latest developments in EU seed reform.
Building on the success of the first Forum, the second Forum was be held in May 2024 with a focused mission: uniting stakeholders to craft a European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) aimed at establishing a comprehensive right to food law. This initiative empowers European citizens to participate directly in the legislative process, proposing new laws to enshrine the right to food across Europe.
Day 1 of ECI Forum for the Right to Food – Géneve, Switzerland
The 2024 Forum, supported by international organizations and esteemed individuals, served as a platform for dialogue, collaboration, and decisive action. By bringing together voices from across Europe, the Forum aimed to forge a collective path towards legislative change, aiming to make the right to food a reality for all.
Drawing inspiration from the first European Citizens’ Initiative on the right to water in 2013, the three-day Forum in May 2024 was organized by Mater Fondazione, the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, and other key partners. It elaborated on the documents submitted for the right to food, building upon the Geneva Right to Food Manifesto adopted in March 2023 and the collective work of European right to food experts.
The Forum benefited from the experience of The ECI Campaign and insights from initiators of other ECIs, including the right to water. Participants engaged in working groups addressing legal, advocacy, marketing, fundraising, operational, and ecosystem aspects to ensure the successful registration of the ECI and the launch of a dynamic campaign.
Soon, the finalized texts from the forum will be uploaded and prepared to kickstart the collection process aimed at gathering 1,000,000 signatures.
Give a check to the website of the ECI petition: https://www.goodfoodforall.eu/
Give a check to the program of the forum
Day 2 at the ECI Forum for the Right to Food
Agroecology in and for Europe (AE4EU Project)
The European project AE4EU has launched the second volume of results from their mapping exercise of the state of agroecology in Europe “Mapping the development of agroecology in Europe – Volume 2”.
Besides an overview of the current state of agroecology, discussing barriers and perspectives for future development, the publication provides examples of implementation of agroecology in the following countries:
- Denmark,
- France,
- Hungary,
- Ireland,
- Moldova,
- The Netherlands,
- Portugal,
- Slovenia,
- Spain,
- Sweden, and
- the UK.
Details on Albania, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Greece, Italy, Kosovo, Malta, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Romania featured in the first volume “Mapping the development of agroecology in Europe – Volume 1” instead, which covered 112 initivatives, examples, cases and agroecological programmes as well as discussing how the term agroecology is used differently in different contexts.
Read more on both the project and the publications on the AE4EU website
APBREBES Newsletter #62
The April issue of the newsletter of the Association for Plant Breeding for the Benefit of Society (APBREBES) reports on the UPOV negotiations concerning smallholders and the interpretation of the exception of private and non-commercial use of plant propagation material. It also covers patents on plants and regulation for the New Genomic Techniques (NGTs) in Europe.
Here is the detail of the content table:
- UPOV Turns a Deaf Ear to the Concerns of Smallholder Farmers
- New Genomic Techniques and Intellectual Property Law: Challenges and Solutions for the Plant Breeding Sector
- African Perspectives on Agroecology – Why Farmer-led Seed and Knowledge Systems Matter
- Advancing Agrobiodiversity – Why Organisations of Smallholders and Indigenous Peoples are Vital
- African Free Trade Agreements and Intellectual Property
Read the newsletter on APBREBES website.
You can subscribe to receive the monthly newsletter direct in your mailbox.
New genomic techniques passed EU parliament! Press releases from ECVC and FoE
The European Parliament confirmed its support for the deregulation of patented GMOs/NGTs, and opened the door to their dissemination without any traceability through the regulation on seeds marketing
On 24 April 2024, all MEPs voted on two files that are absolutely essential for peasants’ rights on seeds and the future of European agriculture, in particular the GMO-free agricultural sector and peasant agroecology.
In a recent press release, the European Coordination Via Campesina (ECVC) strongly condemned the European Parliament’s vote in favor of deregulating genetically modified organisms (GMOs) obtained through new genomic techniques (NGTs). Despite unresolved issues such as the extension of patents, violation of the precautionary principle, and lack of essential information from European agencies, the Parliament proceeded with the vote, disregarding concerns raised by peasant organizations and the GMO-free agricultural sector.
The ECVC press release is available here: https://liberatediversity.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/25-04-2024-PR-NGT-and-PRM-Votes-EP-Plenary-EN.pdf
Friends of the Earth Europe (FoE) also criticized the decision, highlighting its detrimental effects on food and environmental safety. The approved legislative proposal exempts new GMOs from safety checks and reduces the liability of corporations selling them, undermining the precautionary principle in EU policymaking and leaving a significant gap in regulatory coverage.
The press release from FoE is available here: https://friendsoftheearth.eu/press-release/eu-parliament-vote-on-new-gmos-a-blow-to-food-environmental-safety/
Results of the European Parliament vote on Plant Reproductive Materials
Vote on EU seed law: Industry attack on diversity largely defeated EU Parliament votes in favour of farmers’ right to seeds – but fails to strengthen the preservation of local and traditional varieties
text adopted available:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0341_EN.html
Schiltern, Vienna, Strasbourg – 24 April 2024, the plenary of the EU Parliament in Strasbourg voted on the new EU seed law. ARCHE NOAH takes a mixed view of the decision on new rules for the production and marketing of seeds and other plant propagating material. Despite aggressive lobbying by the seed industry and its lobby group Euroseeds in recent days, a majority of MEPs supported the constructive proposal of the Agriculture Committee in almost all points.
“With today’s decision, the European Parliament has recognised that seed diversity is vital for our farmers,”
Magdalena Prieler, seed expert at ARCHE NOAH
The European Parliament’s decision safeguards the age-old tradition and the right of farmers to exchange small quantities of their own propagating material with each other for free or for monetary compensation – a practice that has been practised for generations and strengthens resilience and independence in agriculture. The resolution also grants farmers continued access to traditional varieties such as the old tomato variety Rotes Herz, the Steinfelder Tellerlinse, Laaer Zwiebel and Laufener Landweizen. It also frees them, as well as conservation initiatives, from new bureaucratic regulations. All these points in the report by Herbert Dorfmann, the rapporteur in the responsible Committee on Agriculture, were strongly opposed by the seed industry. Nevertheless, they were ultimately supported by the Social Democrats, the Greens and the Left, as well as parts of the European People’s Party and the liberal Renew Group.
However, the industry lobby has prevailed on one point that is essential for saving traditional and local varieties. The transfer of endangered varieties for the purpose of their conservation should have been exempted from the scope of seed law. This possibility has now been severely restricted. Only established conservation organisations are now allowed to make use of this exception.
“Many actors in Europe contribute to saving the diversity of varieties, including local seed producers, individual farmers, but also public initiatives such as seed libraries. Today’s decision failed to create a clear legal framework for this work which is so important to society as whole. This is disappointing and unacceptable.”
Magdalena Prieler, seed expert at ARCHE NOAH
The industry claimed this exemption would lead to “uncontrolled parallel markets”. In reality, it was about the transfer of very small quantities, for example 500 grams of vegetable seed per year. “The industry used scaremongering and false arguments to persuade MEPs to reject the recommendation of the specialist committee. Diversification and variety on the field are the most effective tools we have to mitigate the negative effects of the climate crisis in agriculture, such as extreme weather conditions or new diseases and pests.”

ARCHE NOAH and other seed initiatives from all over Europe have contacted MEPs in recent days to inform them about the threat to diversity and to demand farmers’ right to seeds. “We would like to thank our supporters who have made this campaign possible and all those who have sent seed packets to the EU Parliament or called MEPs themselves in the last few days and weeks,” says Prieler.
This work will continue after today’s vote. The decision now forms the basis for the European Parliament’s negotiations in the trialogue with the EU Commission and the Council of Agriculture Ministers on the final legislative text. Negotiations are not expected to begin until the end of 2024. A progress report by the Belgian Council Presidency and a discussion by the EU Agriculture Ministers is planned for the last Council meeting before the summer break, on 24 and 25 June 2024. “We call on the Council of EU Agriculture Ministers to resist the pressure from the seed industry. We need a secure basis for a sustainable, resilient and diverse food system,” says Magdalena Prieler from ARCHE NOAH. “Agriculture Ministers must actively ensure that local varieties, regional cuisine and farmers’ right to seeds are not jeopardised by global corporations.”
To know more about seed policy processes in the European Union, have a look at the Seed Policy Guide developed by EC-LLD in collaboration with Arche Noah and Kybele through the Seeding Europe Erasmus+project

Major philanthropies urge massive scale up of agroecology and regenerative approach. An opportunity demanding scrutiny.
25 major philanthropies are calling for a groundbreaking tenfold increase in funding for regenerative and agroecological transitions to tackle urgent global agricultural and environmental challenges. Their joint report, “Cultivating Change: Accelerating and Scaling Agroecology and Regenerative Approaches,” outlines the transformative potential of these sustainable practices.
Key Takeaways:
- The call to action emphasizes the need to phase out fossil fuel use in agriculture and transition towards agroecology to align with the 1.5ºC goal of the Paris Agreement.
- The estimated cost for a global transition to agroecology and regenerative approaches is USD 250-430 billion per year, a fraction of the hidden costs of current practices.
- Current investments fall short, leaving a significant gap of USD 206-386 billion, requiring a tenfold increase to support the necessary transformation.
While the call for increased investment presents an opportunity to transform global food systems, it also demands scrutiny. Can this financial influx truly drive positive change, or might it inadvertently support questionable practices under the guise of agroecology? The need for transparent, accountable, and community-driven initiatives is paramount to avoid the pitfalls of appropriation.
You can find the full report here.
Policymakers should respect the organic movement’s choice on NGTs
At the end of November, IFOAM Organics Europe issued a press release appealing to the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) and Member States to respect organic farmers and operators’ choice to not use Novel Genomic Techniques (NGTs) and maintain the ban on the use of NGTs in organic production as laid out in the Commission’s proposal.
Removing the ban of NGTs would be against the position and wishes of the organic sector. Besides, exempting certain NGTs from risk assessment and traceability would not only have important consequences for the organic market, but for the whole food production sector in Europe.
IFOAM statement comes on the back of the resolution, taken at the institution’s general assembly in the summer, to favour a systemic approach to innovation and against the legitimisation of patents on plant and animals (read more), which reiterated the organic sector position paper on breeding techniques published in 2017.
Alongside the appeal, IFOAM released a briefing by the title Sustainability in organic breeding: Improving the entire system or adjusting some genes?
You can read more on the takeaways from the press release on the hidden dangers of NGTs for the EU on the website of the organisation.
FAO State of Food and Agriculture 2023
The FAO report focusses this year on True Cost Accounting (TCA) as a tool for transformation of the agrifood systems, and attempts for the first time to perform a national-level assessment of such costs for 154 countries, opening the way for targeted national action.
Calculations with available data reveal that the global quantified hidden costs of agrifood systems amount to a minimum of 10 trillion dollars at 2020 purchasing power parity (PPP). Decision making must take these costs into account.
The report is available online in a variety of formats.






























